Link to the related website that has useful info: the Age of Nelson.

This forum is devoted to the Royal Navy during the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars (1793 - 1815).
And why not the other navies of the period?
To avoid spam, you must register to be able to post - it's free.

FAQ         Register         Profile         Search         Log in to check your private messages         Log in
Medical histories
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.ageofnelson.org Forum Index -> Age of Nelson
 
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
johns



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 17

Post Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:26 pm    Post subject: Medical histories Reply with quote

I wondered whether anyone knew if the NA held any medical records / injury info for royal navy servicemen.

I ask as John Clavell recieved a head injury at Trafalgar "which he never fully recovered from" - and was also injured other times as well. For the last two years of his life he was paralysed.

It is a strange question - but it would be really interesting to find out more about these things. The only source I could think of would be the Greenwich hospital, pensioners in papers - but I have no idea how to go about obtaining these Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PMarione
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 883

Post Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that medical records for the period no more exist except for some surgeon's diaries.

In the case of Calvell, he got a pension for wounds so you may be able to find his application at the NA.


Last edited by PMarione on Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:33 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
johns



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 17

Post Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thats fantastic, Thank you very much
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johns



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 17

Post Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think I just found the ref for his Greenwich hospital entry at:

ADM 6/248

However, whether I got the right reference remains to be seen!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chasbaz



Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 38
Location: Athabasca, Alberta, Canada

Post Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm going to be interested in this sort of information, as my ggggfr was wounded in action in 1810 and was off for almost a year. Presumably treatment was first carried out by the ship's surgeon, but then what would happen? My guess is if the ship was a long way from home the patient could be landed somewhere where there were hospital facilities and eventually be repatriated. If sicklists survive they would show something. Did ships' surgeons keep their own logs, or were entries made in the ship's log about such things? Once home, what options were there for further treatment within the Navy? The Gladiator at Portsmouth seems to have been a static ship, and as well as being a venue for courts martial was apparently a hospital ship. Was the greenwich hostpital used for treatment or was it just a home for invalid pensioners - i.e. after being retired? My ggggfr did return to active(?) service but at the end of hostilities he was granted a pension for wounds. What admirality records exist for this?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
PMarione
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 883

Post Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Presumably treatment was first carried out by the ship's surgeon, but then what would happen?


The RN was distributed across the world by "stations": Channel Fleet, East Indies, West Indies, Mediterranean, Ireland, etc., with various ports (varying with the fortunes of war) like Gibraltar, Malta, the Cape etc.
These outports had dockyards and hospitals or hospital ships where the sick and wounded where discharged.
At sea, a fleet or a squadron included hospital ships and surgeon's and doctors of the fleet.

Like all in the RN, there was "red tape" for the sick and wounded. Surgeon's had to keep logs etc.
I am not sure that many of these logs survived. There must be some trace in the muster books of the ships like "DD" (for discharged death) or "discharged sick" etc. I don't know about ships' logs as I have no experience.
Logs and muster books of hospital ships must be of iterest too as the shore hospitals papers like Gibraltar hospital.

Quote:
Once home, what options were there for further treatment within the Navy?


The RN had its own hospitals in the major dockyards like Portsmouth or Plymouth. The best known is Haslar Hospital in Gosport that is still active.
When there was no bed left in the hospitals, sick and wounded were berthed in private houses (and I suppose when there was no hospital abroad).
I have no idea of what survive of these records.

Quote:
Was the greenwich hospital used for treatment or was it just a home for invalid pensioners - i.e. after being retired?


GH was only a home for pensioneers even if it had its own infirmary. It was in no case a "hospital" in the modern sense.

Quote:
...he was granted a pension for wounds. What admirality records exist for this?


To get a pension for wound, the candidate had to apply to the Navy Board.
Records must exist somewhere at TNA or NMM.

The RN administration of the period comprized different "boards" beside the Admiralty Board, like the Navy Board and Transport Board.
There was a "Sick ad Wounded Board" who took in charge the administration of the medical administration of the RN (and of the POW).
Again I have no direct experience but there must be a lot of interesting records there.

Strangely, the medical history of the RN has not attracted many writers.

@+P
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
chasbaz



Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 38
Location: Athabasca, Alberta, Canada

Post Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 2:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Patrick,

Thanks (again) for your very helpful and informative reply. This is one of the things I really like about this forum, and I appreciate your efforts very much.

We shall see where we go with the naval medical history - it certainly is an interesting subject. I imagine the treatment options for officers were somewhat better than for seamen...

Regards,
Charles
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
PMarione
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 883

Post Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 3:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Naval medical history is fascinating indeed and very neglected, like the treatment of the POW in UK, France, Spain, etc.

Quote:
I imagine the treatment options for officers were somewhat better than for seamen...


I am not so sure: medicine was dreadful at the time for everybody.
Bleeding for fevers, purgatives and emetics...
Only war surgery was good if you survived the infections...

An interesting point was that at battle time, everybody was equal in the eyes of the surgeon: wounded were strictly treated in the order of arrival in the cockpit whatever their rank.
There is the well known story of Nelson waiting in line after being wounded at the Nile.

The counterpoint was that there was no sorting according the importance of the wound so you could well bleed to death waiting for the surgeon.

The only advantage for the officer was that he could afford his own doctor or surgeon and maybe get a better treatment.

@+ P
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
johns



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 17

Post Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well I heard back from TNA - they reckon they couldn't find any entry for John Clavell entering Greenwich hospital...very strange.

Also they could not find the naval record of William Simpson Blount (John's son-in-law) despite him being in the Navy for almost 20 years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PMarione
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 883

Post Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 8:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Clavell was nominated a Lt of GH by the Admiralty and so I suppose he was not entered in the same books as the regular pensioneers.
He was part of the staff.

Commander Blount has certainly records at the TNA: at least his examination papers are at ADM107/51 ff262-265.
They didn't check well. Probably just the indexes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
johns



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 17

Post Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you again Patrick! I do not think I have got that - so I will order it!

It was interesting about John Clavell. I think half of the prob is that the cataloguing in TNA is pretty confusing on a whole - so which category to look for can remain a mystery
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PMarione
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 883

Post Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that you will have to find some guide like the ones I quoted somewhere: they'll help you to find in what series of record to check.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
kate.holt



Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 13

Post Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:04 pm    Post subject: John Clavell and Greenwich Hospital Reply with quote

John,
Have you managed to locate a reference for John Clavell's admission to GH? Many references I have found so far indicate he was in GH, and as you say its a matter of finding exactly where he was recorded.

If you are not persuing this let me know and I will try, though it will have to be via the internet. I dont see there is much to be gained with both of us asking them for the same peice of information. I have tonight ordered a copy of his passing certificate, 1797. If you do not already have it I will let you have the details once i get them.

Medical matters are a very interesting subject and one that isnt investigated much. In the early 1800s there wasnt much in the way of treatment for anything and I think we were lucky that any one survived long enough to produce the next generation, but we are here so it must have worked!
_________________
Kate H
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kate.holt



Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 13

Post Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:15 pm    Post subject: GH Reply with quote

Just a thought and apolgies for my ignorance if I should know better.

Were the out pensioners and In pensioners of GH recorded in the contempory Navy List?

I am wondering as John Clavell was "staff" maybe he would still be counted as a Naval Officer, and maybe other ordinary pensioners would be counted as well.
Also in the case of John Clavell, He was described as paralysed for the last part of his life, would he still have been "Staff" then, or would he have been converted to an ordinary in patient?
_________________
Kate H
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PMarione
Site Admin


Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 883

Post Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are thinking in a modern way.

At the time when you got a pension or a post it was for life.
The staff position at GH was more honorary than involving any real duty.
If you were paralised or blind didn't change your status.

The officers of GH are included in the Navy Lists but not the pensioners, so Clavell is in it.
Again when you were a Lt it was for life. To be employed you had to get a commission but that's another story.
The difference with the GH officers was that their had a salary and their half-pay went to GH.

You must think of GH as an old people's home not an hospital.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.ageofnelson.org Forum Index -> Age of Nelson All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
FAQ   Search    Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Nun